EST. MMXXVI · THE INSTITUTION OF RECORD FOR AI CITATION · OPEN METHODOLOGY

The AI Citation Institute sealTHE AI CITATION INSTITUTEEx corpore, auctoritas.

The AI Citation Institute · The Answers

How do you track ChatGPT mentions of your brand?

You track it with a probe, not a screenshot. Start by building a query set from the real questions buyers actually type into an assistant, then run each query across a frozen five-engine panel — ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews — sampling each query several times per engine, because answers vary run to run and a single shot is just noise. Read each returned answer and score it three ways: mentioned (your brand shows up), recommended (the assistant actively points a buyer to you), or absent. Roll those scores into a share, and track that share over time as weekly medians so day-to-day jitter cancels out and a real move is legible. Any time you change the instrument — add an engine, edit a query, adjust the sampling — annotate the change so a shift in the number can't be mistaken for a shift in reality. That separation matters: mention and recommendation are different things. Gavelist, one ongoing The AI Citation Institute client, reached a 58.5% mention rate against the nearest rival's 38.8%, while active recommendation ran about 13%. The gap is the point — being named is common, being recommended is scarce.

The probe, step by step

Measuring AI recommendations is an instrument problem. One query on one engine on one day tells you almost nothing, because assistants sample their own answers and drift. A probe fixes the instrument so the number moves only when reality moves.

The four steps of an AI-visibility probe
StepWhat you doWhy it matters
1. Build the query setWrite the real questions buyers ask an assistant — not your keywords, the phrasing a customer would actually type.You measure the questions that decide purchases, not the ones that flatter you.
2. Run the panelSend each query across the frozen five-engine panel — ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews — several times per engine.Answers vary run to run; sampling several times per engine turns one noisy shot into a stable read.
3. Score the answerRead each response and label it mentioned, recommended, or absent.Being named and being recommended are different outcomes and have to be counted apart.
4. Track weekly mediansRoll the scores into a share and plot it as weekly medians, annotating any change to the instrument.Medians cancel jitter; annotations keep an instrument change from reading as a real shift.

The panel is frozen on purpose — same engines, same sampling — so week-over-week numbers are comparable.

Why one query is noise

Assistants don't return a fixed answer. Ask ChatGPT the same question twice and the wording, the brands named, and the order can all change — that's sampling, built into how these models generate text. So a single query is a coin flip, and a single-engine check misses that ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and AI Overviews each have their own retrieval and their own biases.

The fix is boring and it works: sample each query several times per engine, run every engine in the panel, and read the result as a weekly median. That's why The AI Citation Institute measures across all five engines every week rather than spot-checking one. A number you can't reproduce isn't a measurement.

What to capture per answer

For every sampled answer, record enough to reproduce the read later and to separate a mention from a recommendation. Store the fields below alongside the raw response text.

Fields to log for each sampled answer
FieldWhat it records
QueryThe exact buyer question that was sent.
EngineWhich of the five panel engines produced the answer.
SampleThe run index, since each query is sampled several times per engine.
VerdictMentioned, recommended, or absent.
Competitors namedEvery rival brand the answer surfaced, for share-of-voice.
TimestampWhen the sample ran, so it rolls into the right weekly median.

The full instrument — query panel, sampling cadence, and scoring rubric — is documented at /methodology.

Mention rate vs recommendation rate

Keep the two numbers separate. Mention rate is how often the assistant names you at all; recommendation rate is how often it actively steers a buyer toward you. They move differently, and the gap between them is usually the real story.

For Gavelist, one ongoing The AI Citation Institute client, the probe showed a 58.5% mention rate against the nearest rival's 38.8% — a clear lead on being named. Active recommendation ran about 13%. Getting mentioned is common; getting recommended is scarce, and that's the number worth closing.

Common questions

Why sample each query several times per engine instead of once?+

Assistants sample their own output, so the same question returns different answers run to run. One shot is noise. Sampling several times per engine and reading weekly medians gives you a number you can reproduce and trust.

Which engines should the panel cover?+

A frozen five-engine panel: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews. Each has its own retrieval and biases, so checking one engine misses most of the picture. Keeping the panel frozen keeps week-over-week numbers comparable.

What's the difference between a mention and a recommendation?+

A mention is the assistant naming your brand at all. A recommendation is the assistant actively pointing a buyer to you. They're scored separately because they move differently — for one The AI Citation Institute client, mention rate hit 58.5% while active recommendation ran about 13%.

keep reading

See what AI says about your brand right now — free, on a live engine.

Scan your domain